(function(doc, html, url) { var widget = doc.createElement("div"); widget.innerHTML = html; var script = doc.currentScript; // e = a.currentScript; if (!script) { var scripts = doc.scripts; for (var i = 0; i < scripts.length; ++i) { script = scripts[i]; if (script.src && script.src.indexOf(url) != -1) break; } } script.parentElement.replaceChild(widget, script); }(document, '

Hysteresis Compensation of a Piezoelectric-Stack-Actuator-Driven System

What is it about?

This paper compares tracking performances of the inverse hysteresis model-based feedforward compensator and the feedback-feedforward combined controller for the time-varying hysteresis nonlinearity of a piezoelectric-stack-actuator-driven (PSA-driven) system.

Why is it important?

Three different inverse hysteresis models, including Bouc-Wen, polynomial, and Prandtl-Ishlinskii (PI), are adopted to design feedforward compensator for the PSA-driven compliant system. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) scheme is employed to estimate model parameters of the Bouc-Wen and PI hysteresis models, respectively, whereas the least-mean-square-error based criterion is utilized in identifying the polynomial-based hysteresis model. Although solely feedforward compensation approach seems workable for systems with rate-independent hysteresis or slow tracking trajectories, large modeling errors are inevitable when fast trajectory or rate-dependent hysteresis is facing. To improve tracking performances, conventional PID control is augmented to the feedforward controllers. The resultant scheme is denoted as the feedback-feedforward combined control.

Read more on Kudos…
The following have contributed to this page:
Hung-Yi Chen
' ,"url"));