The paper highlights the way that the idea of a fundamental separation between humans and the material world has influenced Western academic interpretations of making and is associated with a focus on human agency, a disavowal of material forces and the prioritisation of predetermined ‘designs’ and ‘outcomes.’ Therefore, ‘Making’ has been dominated by the idea that human makers use their skills to impose preconceived ideas ‘onto’ materials. This implies that contingencies need to be mitigated or avoided and that ‘happy accidents’ and serendipities are welcome, but unimportant side-effects of the ‘unruliness’ of materials and ‘influences from the environment.’ This paper gives an alternative interpretation of making whereby humans, materials and environmental factors cannot be understood as separate entities and forces. Therefore, ‘happy accidents’ and serendipities can be seen as traces of material and environmental forces and entities that constitute and ‘guide’ the dynamic processes of making and thereby impinge on human agencies and expectations. This paper highlights the importance of makers’ understanding of practices and making as embodied and embedded processes and their understanding of interrelationships between humans and ‘material reality,’ which also suggests that their knowledge and understanding is relevant to posthumanist theories that acknowledge the fundamental interconnectedness of humans and ‘the world.’