(function(doc, html, url) { var widget = doc.createElement("div"); widget.innerHTML = html; var script = doc.currentScript; // e = a.currentScript; if (!script) { var scripts = doc.scripts; for (var i = 0; i < scripts.length; ++i) { script = scripts[i]; if (script.src && script.src.indexOf(url) != -1) break; } } script.parentElement.replaceChild(widget, script); }(document, '
We often think of places as fixed locations and mobility as movement between them. This article shows that the relationship is much more complex. Places are continually made and remade through the movements of people, objects, ideas and information, while every form of mobility is itself shaped by the places through which it occurs. This means that places can, in important ways, be mobile, while mobility is always connected to particular environments, relationships and experiences. The article brings these two perspectives together and explores what they mean for how we understand belonging, home, displacement and being unable to move. It argues that looking at place and mobility together gives us a richer understanding of how people experience and navigate an increasingly interconnected world.
In a world shaped by migration, travel, digital connections, globalization and other forms of movement, it is tempting to assume that place has become less important. This article argues the opposite: mobility does not make place disappear. Instead, mobility continuously creates, transforms and connects places. At the same time, where we are profoundly influences how, why and whether we can move. What is distinctive about the article is that it brings these two sides of the relationship together. Large-scale approaches to globalization often emphasize flows and connections but risk overlooking people's lived experiences of place. More locally focused approaches capture those experiences but may miss the wider structures and power relations that shape them. The article argues that we need both perspectives simultaneously. This is particularly important because mobility is not equally available to everyone. Being prevented from moving can be as significant as being forced to move, and people can even experience displacement while remaining physically in the same location. Understanding this relationship between movement, immobility and place can therefore contribute to more nuanced approaches to migration, displacement, belonging and inequality, while providing a stronger basis for research across disciplinary boundaries.