How Colombian Newspapers Talk About Disability: What Words Do They Use and Why It Matters?
What is it about?
This study looks at the words Colombian newspapers use when talking about people with disabilities. Language shapes how society sees disability, so the terms journalists choose—like “person with a disability” or “disabled person”—can influence attitudes. Using a large collection of news articles from major Colombian newspapers, the research identifies the most common labels and explores whether they follow “person-first” language (putting the person before the disability) or “identity-first” language (putting the disability first). It also examines how political leanings of newspapers affect these choices.
Why is it important?
Words matter. The way media talks about disability can either promote respect and inclusion or reinforce stereotypes. In Colombia, where disability intersects with poverty, conflict, and social inequality, media representation plays a key role in shaping public opinion and policy. This study shows that Colombian newspapers mostly use person-first language, which emphasizes the individual rather than the condition. However, some outdated or negative terms still appear, especially in conservative outlets. Understanding these patterns helps journalists, policymakers, and advocates use language that respects the dignity and diversity of disabled people.