(function(doc, html, url) { var widget = doc.createElement("div"); widget.innerHTML = html; var script = doc.currentScript; // e = a.currentScript; if (!script) { var scripts = doc.scripts; for (var i = 0; i < scripts.length; ++i) { script = scripts[i]; if (script.src && script.src.indexOf(url) != -1) break; } } script.parentElement.replaceChild(widget, script); }(document, '

Using an open-access database to look at how languages express subjects and 'to be'

What is it about?

In this work, I used data from the database Grambank to look at how languages do two things. These are how languages express subjects and how a language expresses 'to be'. Doing these two things in certain ways is supposed to indicate that a language is a certain type called an omnipredicative language. Via statistics, I found that omnipredicative languages do not seem to be very common. I also had some issues along the way, so I made some suggestions for future research looking at omnipredicative languages.

Why is it important?

This paper tests a method that was created a few years ago, and finds that the method works as expected on different data. The method offers us a better way of double-checking what we think we know about how the languages of the world do different things.

Read more on Kudos…
The following have contributed to this page:
Matthew Micyk
' ,"url"));