(function(doc, html, url) { var widget = doc.createElement("div"); widget.innerHTML = html; var script = doc.currentScript; // e = a.currentScript; if (!script) { var scripts = doc.scripts; for (var i = 0; i < scripts.length; ++i) { script = scripts[i]; if (script.src && script.src.indexOf(url) != -1) break; } } script.parentElement.replaceChild(widget, script); }(document, '

Does verb transitivity influence word association responses?

What is it about?

"Eat" is an example of a transitive verb, since it can have an object (e.g. "eat fish"). "Backfire" is an intransitive one, because it usually does not. Does this grammatical distinction affect the way that people respond when words like these are given as cues in a word association task?

Why is it important?

Linguists want to know how words are stored in the mind. What kind of information about words - their spelling, pronunciation, meaning, or their grammatical information, for instance, are stored together? This is valuable in part because it helps us to understand how we learn languages in the first place, and how that storage changes over our lifespan. Word association is one way of analysing the storage of this type of knowledge. The types of words that people give as responses in the word association task can tell us about how we store these words. So by looking at 1) IF transitivity affects word association responses, and 2) HOW that effect manifests itself, we can make deductions about the storage of words.

Read more on Kudos…
The following have contributed to this page:
Peter Thwaites
' ,"url"));