(function(doc, html, url) { var widget = doc.createElement("div"); widget.innerHTML = html; var script = doc.currentScript; // e = a.currentScript; if (!script) { var scripts = doc.scripts; for (var i = 0; i < scripts.length; ++i) { script = scripts[i]; if (script.src && script.src.indexOf(url) != -1) break; } } script.parentElement.replaceChild(widget, script); }(document, '

Khamti Shan anti-ergative construction

What is it about?

It is unusual that a Tai language expresses an anti-ergative (anti-agentive) construction. Because Khamti (Shan) or (Tai) Khamti evidences a primary AOV, as well as a more typical Tai-like AVO, word order, the preverbal O takes a semantic/pragmatic marker. As it turns out, this same marker also signals many other non-agentive roles, including the Goal in ditransitives, strongly suggesting a Tibeto-Burman-like anti-ergative construction.

Why is it important?

It seems worth considering language contact with Tibeto-Burman languages as a source for the development of an anti-ergative construction in a Tai language.

Read more on Kudos…
The following have contributed to this page:
Douglas Inglis
' ,"url"));