(function(doc, html, url) { var widget = doc.createElement("div"); widget.innerHTML = html; var script = doc.currentScript; // e = a.currentScript; if (!script) { var scripts = doc.scripts; for (var i = 0; i < scripts.length; ++i) { script = scripts[i]; if (script.src && script.src.indexOf(url) != -1) break; } } script.parentElement.replaceChild(widget, script); }(document, '

What is it about?

This paper examines the historical loss of ergativity in Eastern Indo-Aryan (EIA) languages, particularly Assamese, Bangla, and Odia. It argues that early stages of these languages (as seen in Caryapada, an 8th–12th-century text) exhibited split ergativity, where past-tense constructions had ergative alignment. This ergative system was tied to a syntactic structure where the Voice head assigned the ergative case. However, modern EIA languages have transitioned to a nominative-accusative alignment. The paper argues that Eastern Indo-Aryan languages lost their ergativity due to the disappearance of the Voice head, which was responsible for assigning ergative case in past-tense contexts. This structural shift resulted in the modern nominative-accusative alignment seen in present-day Assamese, Bangla, and Odia.

Why is it important?

It is broadly important in understanding Syntactic Change in Indo-Aryan Languages

Read more on Kudos…
The following have contributed to this page:
Sayantani Banerjee and Biswanath Dash
' ,"url"));